Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of token efficiency — dense, executable, and free of padding — with a clear simple-to-full progression across the three subcommands. The only real weakness is the managed-policies example, which relies on placeholders instead of a concrete Policy construction and engine setup.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout — no explanation of what policies or compliance are, just API usage, defaults, and one genuinely non-obvious note ("check_compliance takes a Decision object, not a dict"). It assumes Claude's competence and every token earns its place, matching the 5 anchor rather than the 4 anchor (which allows minor over-explanation). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The check_decision_rules example is fully executable with a concrete decision dict and its output shape, and default rule values are stated. The managed-policies path uses placeholders — Policy(...), graph_store, entities=[...], and bare from_version/to_version — so guidance is mostly executable with minor gaps, not copy-paste ready everywhere (not 5), but far above pseudocode (not 3). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The simple-path (check, enforce) to full-path (managed policies) progression is clearly sequenced with each subcommand's requirements stated ("No policy store needed" vs "requires a graph store and versioned Policy objects"). Minor gaps keep it at 4 rather than 5: how decision_data is obtained for enforce, and what to do with violations/warnings in the result, are left implicit; no destructive or batch operations require validation checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the ~62-line body is organized into well-labeled sections (check / enforce / managed policies) with all content appropriately inline for its size. It sits just over the 50-line simple-skill threshold that would allow a 5 on sections alone, and the managed-policy API listing is the kind of content that could eventually split into a reference file, so 4 (good structure, minor organization gaps) fits better than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |