Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized navigation skill with concrete file references and a useful boundary-crossing table. The only soft spot is workflow_clarity, which lacks explicit in-flow validation/feedback checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification checkpoint inside the workflow (e.g., after crossing each boundary, confirm the matching Zod schema or replay consumer before proceeding) to turn the implicit 'Avoid' checks into in-flow validation steps.
Consider a short 'Verify' step that re-traces the reverse path to confirm producer and consumer actually connect, giving the workflow a feedback loop for error recovery.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean body with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (workflow, boundary table, gotchas, output, avoid) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only navigation skill it gives concrete file paths to inspect and a specific gotcha ('attachSession must be awaited before respond() — JSON.stringify(Promise) silently becomes {}'); per scoring notes, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable, fitting the fully-actionable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with an 'Avoid' checklist and a step-5 test-check checkpoint, but it lacks explicit validation/feedback loops within the flow, so it sits at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor gaps' rather than the full-checklist 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized into clear sections (Workflow, Contract Boundaries table, Stave-Specific Guidance, Output, Avoid), which the rubric explicitly allows to score 5 for simple skills. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |