Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, concise skill that efficiently maps Go testing scenarios to appropriate patterns through a clear decision gate table and sequenced execution steps. Its main weakness is the absence of inline executable code examples—all concrete examples are deferred to a references file that isn't provided in the bundle. The workflow is clear with good validation checkpoints, particularly for golden file updates.
Suggestions
Add at least one minimal executable code example inline (e.g., a table-driven test skeleton or a teatest snippet) so the skill body is actionable without relying entirely on the referenced examples file.
Include the references/examples.md bundle file to support the progressive disclosure reference and ensure the skill is self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is lean and purposeful. No unnecessary explanations of Go testing basics, no padding. The decision gate table is an efficient lookup format, and hard rules are terse directives that add genuine value beyond Claude's baseline knowledge. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete guidance through decision gates and hard rules, but lacks any executable code examples in the body itself. The references/examples.md file is cited but not provided in the bundle, so the skill body alone relies on descriptive instructions rather than copy-paste-ready code snippets. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The execution steps are clearly sequenced with a logical flow from identification through pattern selection, implementation, and validation. The golden file update workflow includes an explicit feedback loop (run with -update, inspect diff, rerun without -update), and the decision gate table provides unambiguous routing for each test scenario. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references examples.md for detailed code examples, which is good progressive disclosure structure. However, the bundle file is not provided, so we cannot verify the reference is accurate or useful. The single reference is well-signaled but the skill could benefit from the actual bundle content to fully support the body. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |