Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, highly actionable senior-advisor workflow with strong sequencing, verification gates, and well-signaled one-level references that match the actual bundle files. Its only weakness is mild verbosity in a few repeated caveats about subagent context inheritance.
Suggestions
Collapse the repeated 'subagents do not inherit this skill's context / these rules' reminders into a single canonical statement referenced once, to shave tokens without losing the safety point.
The effort-level table's prose footnotes ('Whatever the level, say in the final report what was not audited...') could move into the table cells or a one-line callout to reduce surrounding narration.
Consider moving the long invocation-variants list into a short table or a references file so the core four-phase workflow reads even faster on first load.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and mostly assumes Claude's competence — no padding explaining what a framework or a test is — but a few sections (the effort-level table footnotes, repeated restatements of 'subagents do not inherit this skill's context') could be tightened without losing the point. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: exact git commands (`git diff --name-only $(git merge-base origin/<default> HEAD)..HEAD`, `gh repo view --json visibility`), explicit directory conventions (`plans/` vs `advisor-plans/`), a ready-to-use plan layout, and specific subagent-prompt requirements — copy-paste ready guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four explicitly sequenced phases (Recon → Audit → Vet/prioritize/confirm → Write plans) with embedded validation checkpoints — 'open the cited code yourself and confirm it', drift detection via `git rev-parse`, done-criteria, escape hatches, and a Vet step that rejects by-design/mis-attributed findings before they reach the table. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear one-level-deep references to real bundle files (references/audit-playbook.md, plan-template.md, closing-the-loop.md), each signposted inline ('read it now', 'read it before writing the first plan') and only loaded when relevant; the body stays an overview rather than inlining the playbook or template. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |