Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable reference with concrete HTML and named APIs, and it appropriately stays self-contained without unnecessary file splitting. Its main weaknesses are minor cross-section redundancy and an only-implicit feedback loop in the renumbering workflow.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated .level-badge note and the repeated data-level="low" HTML block by stating the rule once and cross-referencing it from the other section.
Make the renumbering feedback loop explicit, e.g. 'If gaps or duplicates are found, renumber the affected data-slide values sequentially and re-verify before updating goToSlide() calls.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the .level-badge JS-injection note is stated twice (Journey Bar Level System and Section Divider Format) and the data-level="low" section-divider HTML block is repeated across two sections, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready HTML examples, specific attribute names (data-slide, data-level), and named JS functions (goToSlide(n), querySelectorAll), giving fully executable guidance rather than vague direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Renumbering Rules give a clear 4-step sequence with a validation checkpoint ('Verify no gaps or duplicates exist'), but for a batch HTML-editing operation the error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when gaps/duplicates are found) is only implicit rather than explicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is organized into clearly headed sections (File Location, Slide Format, Journey Bar, Navigation, Renumbering, Section Dividers) with no nested references and no wall of text; as a cohesive single-presentation reference it does not benefit from file splitting. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |