Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is token-efficient and clearly sequenced for a simple task, but it critically depends on reference.md and examples.md, neither of which exists in the bundle. As delivered, the skill's templates and examples are unreachable, which undercuts actionability and breaks the progressive-disclosure structure.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced files (reference.md with the SVG/output templates and examples.md) or inline the templates directly into SKILL.md so the skill is self-contained.
Add a lightweight validation step, e.g. re-read the written SVG to confirm it parses and placeholders were fully replaced.
Remove the redundancy between the H1-intro line and the frontmatter description to reclaim tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is lean: numbered instructions, terse rules, and resource pointers with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its tokens; only the opening line redundantly repeats the frontmatter description. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps name exact output paths and the calling-context inputs ("You will receive three fields... `time`, `timezone`, and `formatted`"), but the executable core — the SVG template and output template — is delegated to [reference.md](reference.md), which does not exist in the bundle. Without it the guidance is incomplete, matching anchor 3; not 4 because the skill cannot actually be executed as delivered. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly ordered 3-step sequence (create SVG from template, write SVG, write summary) for a simple single-purpose task, which per the rubric's simple-skill note could reach 5. Not 5 because step 1 depends on a missing file and there is no validity check for the stated rule "The SVG must be self-contained and valid"; not 3 because the sequence itself is unambiguous. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned with one-level-deep links, but both referenced files — reference.md ("For SVG template, output template, and design specs") and examples.md ("For example input/output pairs") — are absent from references/, so the disclosure structure is broken and the deferred detail is simply unavailable. Anchor 2: minimal viable structure once the broken references are accounted for. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |