Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured deployment skill with good conciseness and organization. The main weaknesses are incomplete actionability for rollback operations (described but not executable) and missing error recovery workflows for when deployments or health checks fail.
Suggestions
Add executable rollback commands (e.g., specific docker/caddy commands to switch traffic back to previous slot)
Add error recovery steps: what to do if health check fails after 30 attempts, how to manually intervene
Include specific command for rollback to a particular image version, not just description
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Content is lean and efficient with no unnecessary explanations. Every section serves a purpose - tables, commands, and checklists are all actionable without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete commands for deployment and slot checking, but rollback section is vague ('이전 슬롯으로 트래픽 전환') without actual executable commands. Missing specific rollback commands. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Deployment process has clear 5-step sequence, but lacks explicit validation/error recovery steps. Checklists are present but no feedback loops for what to do if health checks fail or how to actually perform rollback. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill of this size (~60 lines), content is well-organized with clear sections. No need for external references given the scope. Tables and code blocks are appropriately used for different content types. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |