Content
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill reads more like a role description or capability overview than actionable guidance. It lists frameworks and templates Claude already knows without providing project-specific instructions, concrete execution steps, or validation checkpoints. The content would benefit from focusing on what's unique to this project's analysis needs rather than generic PM knowledge.
Suggestions
Replace generic framework definitions (SWOT, Porter's 5 Forces) with project-specific analysis instructions or remove them entirely—Claude knows these concepts
Add concrete workflows: e.g., 'To perform competitor analysis: 1. Run X command, 2. Gather data from Y sources, 3. Output to Z format'
Include executable examples showing how to actually produce an analysis artifact, not just empty templates
Specify validation steps: how to verify analysis quality, what constitutes a complete deliverable, review checkpoints before finalizing reports
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content includes useful frameworks and templates but explains concepts Claude already knows (SWOT, Porter's 5 Forces, TAM/SAM/SOM definitions). The KPI tables with generic targets add bulk without project-specific value. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill describes what an analyst does and lists frameworks but provides no executable guidance. There are no concrete commands, code, or step-by-step instructions for actually performing analyses—just definitions and empty templates. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No clear workflow or sequence is provided. The skill lists categories of work (시장 분석, 사용자 분석, etc.) but doesn't explain how to execute any of them, when to use which framework, or how to validate outputs. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is organized with clear headers and sections, and references output locations. However, it's somewhat monolithic with framework definitions that could be in separate reference files, and lacks links to detailed methodology guides. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |