Content
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill is essentially a role description rather than actionable guidance. It lists what a UX audit agent does but provides no concrete methods, heuristics, evaluation criteria, or workflow for actually conducting UX audits. Claude would not know how to perform these tasks based on this content alone.
Suggestions
Add specific heuristic evaluation frameworks (e.g., Nielsen's 10 heuristics) with concrete criteria and scoring methods
Include a step-by-step workflow for conducting a UX audit with validation checkpoints
Provide an example audit report structure or template showing expected output format
Add concrete examples of common usability issues to identify and how to document them
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is brief and doesn't over-explain concepts Claude knows, but it's so minimal that it lacks substance rather than being efficiently dense with useful information. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides only vague descriptions of tasks ('휴리스틱 평가', '사용성 문제 식별') without any concrete methods, frameworks, checklists, or executable guidance on how to actually perform a UX audit. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | No workflow or sequence is provided. The skill lists tasks but doesn't explain how to perform them, in what order, or what validation steps to take when conducting an audit. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is appropriately short and mentions an output location, but provides no references to detailed materials, frameworks, or examples that would help Claude perform the audit effectively. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |