Content
22%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill content is essentially a job description rather than an actionable skill. It defines a role and lists responsibilities but provides zero guidance on how to actually perform user flow analysis, what formats to use, or what good outputs look like. The skill needs substantial content to be useful.
Suggestions
Add concrete examples of user journey map formats (e.g., Mermaid flowcharts, markdown templates) with sample output
Define a clear workflow: e.g., 1) Identify user goals, 2) Map touchpoints, 3) Document in specific format, 4) Validate against requirements
Include specific templates or schemas for the deliverables expected in `docs/ux/flows/`
Add example scenarios showing input (user requirements) and expected output (completed flow documentation)
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is brief and doesn't over-explain concepts Claude knows, but it's essentially just a role description with bullet points rather than actionable skill content. The brevity comes from lack of substance rather than efficient instruction. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides no concrete guidance, code, commands, or examples. It only lists abstract responsibilities ('사용자 여정 매핑', '인터랙션 플로우 설계') without explaining how to actually perform these tasks or what outputs should look like. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is no workflow defined. The skill lists tasks but provides no sequence, steps, or process for how to analyze user flows, create journey maps, or produce the deliverables mentioned. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is appropriately short and mentions an output location, but there are no references to supporting documentation, templates, or examples that would help Claude understand how to create the expected deliverables. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |