Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instruction skill with concrete tool guidance and clean sections; the only real gap is an explicit verify-fix-reverify loop for the post-edit validation step.
Suggestions
Make the post-edit feedback loop explicit: "If Grep finds stale references, fix them and re-verify before moving on" to lift workflow_clarity to 3.
Add a one-line pre-flight check that the prior-read requirement is satisfied before the first edit, so the sequence's first checkpoint is explicit rather than buried in the Discipline section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: short discipline rules and named tools with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable — named tools (ListFiles, Grep, EnterPlanMode) with specific checks ("Verify with Grep that no stale references remain") and decision rules; per the instruction-only scoring note, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Before/After sequencing with an explicit verification step exists, but the error-recovery feedback loop (what to do when verification finds stale references) is only implicit rather than spelled out, which the top anchor requires. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections (Discipline, Before any edit, After every edit, Don't), meeting the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |