CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

code-reviewer

Review pull requests, diffs, and code changes across behavior, contracts, tests, maintainability, and documentation. Use when the user asks for review of a PR, patch, diff, commit, or code change.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, token-efficient skill body: lean prose, executable guidance, a clearly sequenced review workflow with validation checkpoints, and clean one-level progressive disclosure to verified reference files.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean throughout; it assumes Claude's competence, does not re-explain review fundamentals, and every section (scopes table, command cues, severity rubric, output template) earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable command cues (gh pr view/diff, git diff/show variants), a copy-paste-ready delegate prompt template, and a complete output template rather than vague direction.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Multi-step flow is clearly sequenced (Setup -> Safety -> Coverage -> Flow -> Verification -> Findings Bar -> Output) with explicit verification/validation checkpoints ('verify each retained finding against the diff and nearby code', partial-coverage rules).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references to five existing files (behavior.md, contract.md, test.md, simplicity.md, documentation.md), each verified present in references/; no nested references.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description that names concrete capabilities, includes explicit trigger guidance, and occupies a clearly distinct niche. No vague fluff, over-claims, or voice issues.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions (review PRs, diffs, code changes) across six named dimensions (behavior, contracts, tests, maintainability, documentation), matching the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what (review pull requests, diffs, code changes across named dimensions) and when via an explicit 'Use when the user asks...' clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing triggers are well covered ('PR, patch, diff, commit, or code change'), terms a user would actually say; not just jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear, well-scoped niche (code/PR review) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
shillem/cc-marketplace
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.