Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable guide with a complete executable command and a built-in verification step. Its only minor gap is the absence of an explicit numbered workflow with error-recovery feedback, which is not strictly required for a simple search skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is lean and assumes Claude's competence; no tokens are spent explaining what GitHub or code search is, and each line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a fully executable, copy-paste-ready `gh search code` command complete with flags, JSON output, and a jq transform, plus concrete filter options covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are sequenced (search, refine, respect budget, verify results) and "Using Results" gives an explicit verification checkpoint, but there is no numbered workflow or error-recovery loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, with well-organized section headers (Flow, Query Guidance, Budget, Using Results) that make navigation trivial. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |