CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

recipe-front-plan

Create frontend work plan from design document and obtain plan approval

50

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/recipe-front-plan/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Context: Dedicated to the frontend planning phase.

Orchestrator Definition

Core Identity: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill)

Execution Protocol:

  1. Delegate all work to sub-agents — your role is to invoke sub-agents, pass data between them, and report results
  2. Follow subagents-orchestration-guide skill planning flow:
    • Execute steps defined below
    • Stop and obtain approval for plan content before completion
  3. Scope: See Scope Boundaries below

CRITICAL: When the user requests test generation, always execute acceptance-test-generator first — it provides the test skeleton that work-planner depends on.

Scope Boundaries

Included in this skill:

  • Design document selection
  • Test skeleton generation with acceptance-test-generator
  • Work plan creation with work-planner
  • Work plan review with document-reviewer
  • Plan approval obtainment

Responsibility Boundary: This skill completes with work plan approval.

Follow the planning process below:

Execution Process

Step 1: Design Document Selection

! ls -la docs/design/*.md | head -10

  • Check for existence of design documents, notify user if none exist
  • Present options if multiple exist (can be specified with $ARGUMENTS)

Step 2: Test Skeleton Generation Confirmation

  • Confirm with user whether to generate test skeletons (integration + fixture-e2e + service-integration-e2e) first
  • If user wants generation: acceptance-test-generator generates skeletons across all applicable lanes
    • Invoke acceptance-test-generator using Agent tool:
      • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:acceptance-test-generator"
      • description: "Test skeleton generation"
      • If UI Spec exists: prompt: "Generate test skeletons from Design Doc at [path]. UI Spec at [ui-spec path]."
      • If no UI Spec: prompt: "Generate test skeletons from Design Doc at [path]."
  • Pass integration test file path, fixture-e2e and service-integration-e2e file paths (or null per lane), and e2eAbsenceReason (per lane) to work-planner according to subagents-orchestration-guide "acceptance-test-generator → work-planner" section

Step 3: Work Plan Creation

Invoke work-planner using Agent tool:

  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:work-planner"

  • description: "Work plan creation"

  • If test skeletons were generated in Step 2, build the prompt by listing every lane's status:

    • Always include: "Integration test file: [path or 'not generated']"
    • For each E2E lane (fixtureE2e, serviceE2e):
      • When generatedFiles.<lane> is not null: "[lane] test file: [path]"
      • When generatedFiles.<lane> is null: "No [lane] skeleton generated (reason: [e2eAbsenceReason.])"
    • Append placement guidance: "Integration tests are created simultaneously with each phase implementation. fixture-e2e tests are created alongside the UI feature phase. service-integration-e2e tests are executed only in the final phase."
  • If test skeletons were not generated: prompt: "Create work plan from Design Doc at [path]."

  • Follow subagents-orchestration-guide Prompt Construction Rule for additional prompt parameters

Step 4: Work Plan Review

Invoke document-reviewer to review the work plan:

  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:document-reviewer"
  • description: "Work plan review"
  • prompt: "doc_type: WorkPlan target: docs/plans/[plan-name].md. Review semantic traceability to the Design Doc, early verification placement, real-boundary verification coverage, Failure Mode Checklist, and Review Scope."
  • The work plan is a derivation of the Design Doc, so plan-fidelity findings are resolved without user input. Branch on the reviewer's verdict.decision: on needs_revision, re-invoke work-planner in update mode with the findings and re-review, repeating until approved or approved_with_conditions. On rejected, escalate to the user.

Step 5: Present for Approval

  • Present the reviewed work plan to the user for batch approval. If the user requests changes, re-invoke work-planner with revised parameters and re-run Step 4.
  • Highlight steps with unclear scope or external dependencies and ask the user to confirm

Response at Completion

Recommended: End with the following standard response after plan content approval

Frontend planning phase completed.
- Work plan: docs/plans/[plan-name].md
- Status: Approved

Please provide separate instructions for implementation.
Repository
shinpr/claude-code-workflows
Last updated
Created

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.