Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly structured, highly actionable orchestration recipe with explicit validation gates and feedback loops, scoring high on workflow clarity and actionability. It is efficient and well-sectioned, with only minor conciseness trims and progressive-disclosure organization gaps.
Suggestions
Remove the redundant 'Follow the planning process below:' line that duplicates the Execution Protocol / Execution Process heading.
Consolidate the Scope Boundaries and Execution Protocol sections, which overlap on what the skill includes and where it completes.
Clarify the placeholder resolution for [Design Doc path] and [plan-name].md with a one-line note on how the values are derived to close the actionability gap to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence with domain-specific gates rather than padding, though a few redundant lines ('Follow the planning process below' plus repeated scope framing) could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps give concrete, executable Agent invocations with exact subagent_type and field mappings plus the 'mechanical extraction' instruction; minor placeholders like [Design Doc path] and conditional 'when one exists' clauses keep it just short of fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence carries explicit validation checkpoints (Review Resolution Gate, mandatory approval stop) and feedback loops (re-invoke work-planner on user changes and re-run Step 4), matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The document is well-organized into distinct sections with clear navigation and is self-contained (no local bundle files exist), but at ~90 lines with some inline density it is not the clean simple-skill 5 case. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |