Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written orchestration workflow with fully executable prompt templates, explicit review feedback loops, and strong sequencing anchored by a completion checklist. Its only weaknesses are minor repetition of scope/gate framing and an all-inline structure that could offload detail (e.g. layer detection or ADR guidance) to reference files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is imperative and dense with no concept over-explanation, but restates the out-of-scope condition three times and repeats gate/approval framing, leaving minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready Agent prompt blocks per document type, exact reviewer invocation shapes, and a declared mechanical extraction rule make the guidance fully executable and cover the common Design Doc, PRD, and ADR cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation (code-verifier, document-reviewer), feedback loops (revise then re-review with prior_feedback, retry-once on agent failure), and a completion checklist, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned headers, a workflow diagram, and only one-level-deep references (external skill files such as references/review-resolution.md), but the ~196-line body keeps everything inline with no local bundle, leaving minor organization headroom. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |