Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction-only skill with a clear three-phase workflow, explicit source-verification checkpoints, and a concrete output template that distinguishes confirmed from pending compliance. The main weaknesses are mild redundancy of verification guidance across sections and an illustrative example that describes the dossier rather than demonstrating it.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping verification guidance from FASE 3, 'Método y formato de fuentes', 'Reglas de Oro' #3, and Limitations into a single verification section to remove repetition.
Replace the abstract Example with one filled dossier row (e.g., RGPD for a Spanish dental clinic: source URL + date, aplicabilidad 'posible', comprobación 'pendiente') so the output format is demonstrated, not just described.
Trim the persona preamble ('Soy el Estratega...') to a single line, since it adds framing but no actionable guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and instructive with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the persona preamble ('Soy el Estratega de Inteligencia de Dominio...') and verification guidance repeated across FASE 3, 'Método y formato de fuentes', 'Reglas de Oro' #3, and Limitations could be consolidated. It sits above 'mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation' (3) but short of 'every token earns its place' (5) due to this repetition. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete dossier template with explicit columns (requisito, fuente primaria + fecha, aplicabilidad, comprobación) and status values (confirmada/posible/pendiente), plus a worked trigger example. Some analysis steps remain abstract ('analizo los siguientes aspectos y entrego conclusiones breves') and the Example section describes the dossier rather than showing a filled row, keeping it below fully copy-paste-ready guidance (5) but above pseudocode-level gaps (3). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced phases with a dedicated verification phase: check each requirement against sector and jurisdiction, open the primary source and check date/version/scope, mark unverifiable norms 'pendiente' instead of inventing them, and correct contradictions before delivering. This is an explicit validate-and-fix-before-deliver feedback loop with the dossier format acting as a checklist — the top anchor for an instruction-only skill; no destructive/batch-operation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained single-file skill with clear section headers, no nested references, and no content that clearly belongs in a separate bundle file. It falls short of the top anchor only through mild redundancy: verification guidance is spread across four sections (FASE 3, Método, Reglas de Oro, Limitations), which slightly hurts navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |