Content
56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill presents a clear two-phase instructional workflow with a well-defined dossier deliverable, and as an instruction-only skill it does not suffer from missing code. Its main weaknesses are padding (duplicated sections, persona fluff), the absence of a sample dossier or output template in the Example section, and inconsistent structure that keeps it from reading as a tight, well-organized single-file skill.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated "When to Use" section and the persona preamble; keep one trigger section and lead with the two-phase protocol to cut roughly a quarter of the body's tokens.
Replace the bare user-request Example with a short sample "Dossier de Inteligencia" (even a skeleton with the four required sections filled for one example niche) so the expected output format is unambiguous.
Normalize the structure: single H1 at the top, consistent heading hierarchy, and one language convention for section headers to remove the current organizational roughness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but contains padding: a duplicated "When to Use" section (one before the H1 title, one near the end), persona framing ("Soy el Estratega… No Programo código genérico"), and platitudes like "Estándar de Diamante". It is not a 2 because it never explains concepts Claude already knows and is reasonably short overall. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There is concrete guidance for an instruction-only skill: a two-phase protocol and a four-part dossier structure (Stack de Industria, Cumplimiento y Normativa, UX de Nicho, Puntos de Dolor Ocultos) plus a specific rule example (dental clinics → turnos, odontogramas, historias clínicas). It is not a 4 because the "## Example" section shows only a user request with no sample output, and no dossier template or output format is provided. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced: FASE 1 domain analysis with three numbered reasoning questions, then FASE 2 dossier delivery with four named sections. Validation checkpoints are absent but the skill performs analysis/instruction only — no destructive or batch operations — so the workflow-clarity cap does not apply; it stays below 5 because checkpoints and error-recovery guidance are still missing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and no external references, so nothing is nested or buried. However, organization is uneven: the duplicate "When to Use" section, an H1 appearing after an H2, and mixed English/Spanish section conventions match "some structure but could be better organized" rather than the well-organized anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |