Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a concrete, safely-sequenced workflow for a batch operation, including duplicate-submit and ambiguous-response handling that most routing skills omit. Its main weaknesses are redundancy: the When to Use section duplicates the description and the Example section is a contentless stub.
Suggestions
Delete or merge the "When to Use" section, which restates the frontmatter description nearly verbatim, to tighten conciseness.
Replace the "Example" stub (a quoted user request with no output) with a worked example showing a real frame listing and a completed acc_act submission including a PREDICT line, or remove the section.
State where submit_token and frame_id values come from (e.g. the `acc frames` listing output) and fill in the ellipsis placeholders to close the actionability gaps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core workflow steps are lean, but the "When to Use" section repeats the frontmatter description almost verbatim, the "Example" section holds only a quoted user request with no output, and "Limitations" is generic boilerplate. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present: the read-only command `acc frames`, the exact call acc_act(runtime="continue", input={"frame_id", "submit_token", "proposal_text"}), and the PREDICT line format. Minor gaps remain, such as ellipsis placeholders and no indication of where submit_token values originate. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear list → deliberate → submit → surface-ids sequence exists with real batch-operation safeguards ("check the installed runtime's duplicate-submit contract before retrying; do not infer success from an ambiguous response"), but there is no explicit per-submission verify-success checkpoint, leaving minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files, the body is organized into clear headed sections (When to Use / Example / Limitations / Execution boundaries), but the placeholder "Example" section adds no content, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |