advogado-especialista

Advogado especialista em todas as areas do Direito brasileiro: familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional.

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/advogado-especialista/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

55%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The SKILL.md body is a token-efficient overview that correctly offloads detail to a single clearly signaled reference, but it provides almost no actionable or sequenced guidance itself and leaves one bundle file unreferenced. It is well-structured as a pointer yet thin as standalone instruction.

Suggestions

Inline a minimal concrete first step or two (e.g. identify the legal area, then load the matching module from the guide) so the body is actionable without opening the reference.

Add an explicit sequenced workflow with a validation/checkpoint step (e.g. confirm jurisdiction and area before drafting) to raise workflow clarity.

Reference references/fontes.md from the body or the detailed guide so the entire bundle is navigable.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: a short pointer to the detailed guide plus compact trigger/scope lists, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.	5 / 5
Actionability	The body offers only high-level direction ('Read the detailed guide before executing this skill') and trigger lists, with no concrete steps, commands, or examples actually inlined, matching 'minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute'.	2 / 5
Workflow Clarity	No sequenced workflow is present in the body itself — the entire procedure is deferred to the external guide, leaving only rough, implicit ordering ('read guide then act'), which fits the 'rough sequence present but many gaps; steps poorly defined' anchor.	2 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body cleanly points to a real one-level-deep reference (references/detailed-guide.md) with a clearly signaled link, but references/fontes.md exists in the bundle and is not referenced from the body or the guide, a minor organization gap that keeps it below a 5.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Description

56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description effectively names a broad but well-scoped legal domain with natural Portuguese keywords, but it describes a role rather than concrete actions and omits any explicit 'when to use' guidance. It is distinct yet under-specified on capability and activation.

Suggestions

Replace the role label with concrete actions, e.g. 'Elabora pecas, analisa jurisprudencia e orienta em casos de familia, criminal, trabalhista...'.

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use quando o usuario precisar de orientacao juridica, redacao de pecas ou analise de casos em qualquer area do Direito brasileiro.'

Include common synonyms a user might say ('advocacia', 'processo', 'juridico', 'lei') to round out trigger coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description names the domain exhaustively ('familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional') but states no concrete actions — only 'Advogado especialista em todas as areas', which is a role label, not an action, matching the 'names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' anchor.	2 / 5
Completeness	It gives a clear 'what' (a specialist across nine listed legal areas) but contains no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	It surfaces natural terms a Brazilian user would say ('advogado', 'Direito', plus eight concrete practice areas), giving good keyword coverage; a few natural synonyms (e.g. 'advocacia', 'processo') are missing, so it is not a 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	It carves a clear Brazilian-law niche with distinct, domain-specific triggers and minimal overlap risk with unrelated skills; it stops short of 5 only because the lack of explicit trigger phrasing leaves some ambiguity about activation.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Path: skills/advogado-especialista/SKILL.md
Commit: b1aebac

Reviewed: ~19 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.