Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary instruction-only skill: a well-sequenced five-step workflow with explicit validation before handoff, concrete commands and a worked evidence-to-result example, honest reporting requirements ('Never say a command was tested when it was only read from config'), and strong safety notes. The only weaknesses are minor redundancy between How It Works, Best Practices, and Common Pitfalls, and the absence of any bundle split for a fairly long single file. Strong result overall.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is disciplined and high-signal — no padding, no explaining concepts Claude already knows — but the 'Best Practices' and 'Common Pitfalls' sections restate rules already given in 'How It Works' (e.g., 'do not invent a file-scoped invocation' vs. 'Guessing commands: infer tools from manifests, not popularity'). Not 5 because of that redundancy; not 3 because the over-explanation is minor, not 'some unnecessary explanation' throughout. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete discovery commands ('rg --files'), an executable good-example command ('npm test -- path/to/file.test.ts') contrasted with a vague bad example, and a complete evidence-to-result worked example with a copy-paste-ready AGENTS.md artifact. Per the scoring notes, absence of runnable code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. Not 4 because commands and examples are specific and cover the common create/revise cases fully. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced five-step process where step 5 is an explicit validation checklist (re-read changed files, remove contradictions, confirm every mentioned file exists, cross-check commands against manifests/CI, review the diff as a maintainer) with a feedback loop. Appropriate validation is present for this state-changing skill, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. Not 4 because validation checkpoints are explicit and thorough, not just 'most' present. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single well-organized SKILL.md (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle exists) with clear section headings, and nothing inlined that clearly belongs in a separate file. Not 5 because at ~200 lines it exceeds the simple <50-line case, and the Examples and Related Skills sections plus the detailed step-5 checklist could arguably be split out or trimmed; not 3 because structure and organization are strong with no buried content. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |