CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ai-studio-image

Geracao de imagens humanizadas via Google AI Studio (Gemini). Fotos realistas estilo influencer ou educacional com iluminacao natural e imperfeicoes sutis.

53

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/ai-studio-image/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with copy-paste commands and a clear five-step workflow, but is let down by boilerplate filler, missing validation for batch generation, and a broken reference file. Tightening the filler and adding a verification step would substantially improve the score.

Suggestions

Remove the generic Best Practices / Common Pitfalls / Related Skills boilerplate and the duplicated Overview section to tighten conciseness.

Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint after batch generation (e.g., confirm output files exist and inspect before delivering) to lift workflow_clarity past the batch cap.

Fix the broken references/api-reference.md link by either creating the file or removing it from the Referencias list, and replace hard-coded Windows paths with relative or platform-agnostic paths.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but includes a duplicated Overview/title section and generic copy-paste boilerplate ('Review all suggestions before applying them to production code', 'Combine with other complementary skills for comprehensive analysis') that does not earn its tokens, fitting anchor 3.

3 / 5

Actionability

Commands are fully executable and copy-paste ready (generate.py, prompt_engine.py, templates.py with full arguments), supported by tables of models, formats, and templates that cover the common cases, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The five-step workflow is clearly sequenced, but batch operations (--variations) and generation lack any validation/verification checkpoint; the rubric caps batch skills without validation at 3, so it cannot reach 4.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Section structure is reasonable and scripts/references are linked, but the Referencias section lists references/api-reference.md which does not exist in the bundle, breaking navigation and leaving it at anchor 3 rather than 4.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does and uses natural trigger terms, but lacks an explicit 'when to use' clause and has some overlap risk with sibling image skills. Adding a concrete Use-when clause and listing distinct actions would raise the score.

Suggestions

Append an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming concrete triggers (e.g., 'Use when the user asks to generate realistic photos, influencer-style images, or educational visuals via Gemini').

List a few concrete actions (generate, batch-variations, apply templates, iterate) to lift specificity from 3 toward 4-5.

Differentiate from sibling skills by naming the distinctive humanization feature more explicitly in the trigger phrase.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('Geracao de imagens humanizadas') and concrete output qualities ('Fotos realistas estilo influencer ou educacional', 'iluminacao natural e imperfeicoes sutis'), but does not enumerate several distinct actions, so it falls at anchor 3 rather than 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

The description gives a clear 'what' but no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause; per the rubric a missing when-clause caps completeness at 3, and it is not vague enough to drop to 2.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing phrases like 'Geracao de imagens', 'fotos realistas', and 'iluminacao natural' are present with good coverage of variations, though a few synonyms or extensions are missing, fitting anchor 4.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (humanized realistic photos via Gemini) is somewhat specific but overlaps with related image-generation skills like image-studio and stability-ai, matching the anchor 3 'could still overlap with similar skills'.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.