Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, executable workflow document: concrete commands, a tracked checklist, and an error-recovery table make it immediately actionable. The main gaps are the absence of a concrete example input for the run script and no explicit output-validation checkpoint before summarization.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example of a filled-in run command, e.g. --actor "compass/google-maps-extractor" --input '{"searchStringsArray":["coffee shop"],"locationQuery":"Berlin","maxCrawledPlaces":50}', so JSON_INPUT is not an unresolved placeholder.
Insert a validation checkpoint between Step 4 and Step 5, such as checking the output row count or file contents and retrying with adjusted input if empty, to close the workflow's feedback loop.
Tighten small padding items — the '(No need to check it upfront)' parenthetical and the vague 'Based on character of use case' guidance — to reach full token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-driven with a dense actor-selection table and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor instances could be trimmed, such as the parenthetical '(No need to check it upfront)' in Prerequisites and the vague 'Number of results: Based on character of use case', so it does not reach the every-token-earns-its-place anchor of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable commands are given throughout — the mcpc schema-fetch call and the three run_actor.js invocations with exact flags. It falls short of fully copy-paste ready because 'JSON_INPUT' is a placeholder that is never instantiated with a concrete example payload, leaving a minor gap in covering the most common case. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A five-step sequence with a copyable progress checklist and an Error Handling section mapping failures to fixes provides clear sequencing and error-recovery guidance. It misses a 5 because there is no explicit validation checkpoint on the output itself (e.g., verify result count or file contents) before summarizing in Step 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well sectioned (When to Use, Workflow, Error Handling, Limitations) and the only external dependency, the run_actor.js script, is referenced one level deep and clearly signaled inside the commands. It does not reach 5 because the ~125-line body inlines the full 16-actor catalog and error handling without any navigational signposting to separate materials, and the referenced script lives outside the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |