Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable API reference with a clear deploy workflow and a genuine status-validation checkpoint, and it appropriately treats deployment as an authorization-sensitive operation. Its weaknesses are duplication of the description in the body, the ~110-line inline tool reference that should be split into a references file (with a dangling reference to a nonexistent generator script), and the lack of an explicit failed-deployment recovery loop or worked deploy_app payload example.
Suggestions
Move the 'Available Tools' parameter reference to references/tools.md and keep only the tool names with one-line purposes in SKILL.md, linking out for parameters; remove the footer citing the absent scripts/generate-appdeploy-skill.ts.
Drop the 'When to Use This Skill' section or compress it to a single line, since it duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim in substance.
Add a worked deploy_app example (a minimal files[] payload for a new html-static app) and an explicit recovery step after get_app_status failure: fix errors, then redeploy only changed files and re-check status.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly dense, useful parameter documentation, but the 'When to Use This Skill' section (5 bullets) and the deploy_app tool description largely duplicate the frontmatter description, and a couple of bullets ('Use when planning or building apps and web apps') add vague padding — fitting anchor 3's 'could be tightened' rather than anchor 4's 'minor instances'. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Setup and the JSON-RPC call pattern are given as concrete copy-paste curl commands with exact headers, and all 11 tools are documented with typed required/optional parameters — but the commands still carry {endpoint}/{tool_name} placeholders and there is no worked deploy_app example showing a files[] or diff payload, so it falls at anchor 4 rather than the fully-executable common-case coverage of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-step workflow is clearly sequenced with a validation checkpoint (get_app_status after deploy) and the boundaries section adds 'verify ready plus live behavior; inspect status before retrying uncertain writes'. However, the failed-build→fix→redeploy feedback loop is only implicit and destructive operations (delete_app) carry a warning but no verification step, matching anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps' rather than anchor 5's explicit feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is well-sectioned but the 'Available Tools' section is ~110 lines of API reference inlined in SKILL.md that belongs in a references file (no bundle files exist), and the footer references 'scripts/generate-appdeploy-skill.ts' which is not present — matching anchor 3's 'content that should be separate is inline' rather than anchor 4's 'most content appropriately placed'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |