CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

azure-communication-chat-java

Build real-time chat applications with thread management, messaging, participants, and read receipts.

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/azure-communication-chat-java/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, highly actionable API reference with executable examples and sensible privacy guardrails. Its weaknesses are the absence of validation before destructive operations, minor undefined-symbol gaps in code examples, and a monolithic single-file structure with some boilerplate padding.

Suggestions

Add a verification checkpoint before destructive operations, e.g. fetch and confirm thread properties (getProperties / listMessages) before deleteChatThread or deleteMessage, and treat non-2xx responses as a fix-and-retry loop.

Fix the example gaps: import ChatAsyncClient, Context, OffsetDateTime, and ListChatMessagesOptions where used, and define messageId before it is referenced in 'Get Messages'.

Move the per-operation API reference material (operation examples, Message Types table, Pagination details) into a references/ file and link it from a concise overview, and drop the filler 'When to Use' and 'Trigger Phrases' sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dominated by lean, executable code with no explanation of basic concepts, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' anchor. Trim points: the pinned version '1.6.0' (time-sensitive info outside a deprecated section), the filler 'When to Use' section ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.'), and the 'Trigger Phrases' section which duplicates the description's job.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, near copy-paste-ready code covers installation, client creation, every operation category, pagination, and error handling — 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'. Not a 5 because several examples reference symbols that are never imported or defined (ChatAsyncClient, Context.NONE, OffsetDateTime, and messageId in 'Get Messages').

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Per-task sequences are clear via code and the Error Handling section gives recovery guidance, but the skill includes destructive operations (deleteChatThread, deleteMessage) with no validation or verification step before them. Per the rubric, missing validation in workflows involving destructive or batch operations caps workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

There are no bundle files; all ~325 lines of per-operation API reference material and tables are inlined in SKILL.md. Sections are well-organized with headers (above anchor 2), but the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply, and content that belongs in separate reference files (detailed operation examples, message-types table) is inline with no external references — anchor 3.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description communicates concrete capabilities in third person with natural keywords, but it is incomplete and generic with respect to its niche. It lacks any 'when to use' trigger guidance and never mentions Azure Communication Services or Java, weakening both completeness and distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when building chat or real-time messaging features in Java with Azure Communication Services, or when the user mentions chat threads, read receipts, or typing notifications.'

Name the platform and language ('Azure Communication Services', 'Java SDK') in the description so it is distinguishable from generic chat/messaging skills and matches what users actually say.

Round out the capability list with the remaining concrete actions the skill covers (typing notifications, pagination, thread topic updates) to move specificity toward comprehensive.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Build real-time chat applications') and four concrete capability areas ('thread management, messaging, participants, and read receipts'), matching the 'several specific actions; minor gaps in coverage' anchor. It is not a 5 because 'messaging' is generic and installation/configuration actions are absent.

4 / 5

Completeness

It has a clear 'what' (build chat applications with thread management, messaging, participants, read receipts) but no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It contains good natural keywords ('chat applications', 'real-time', 'chat thread', 'participants', 'read receipts') but omits the natural terms users would most likely say for this skill: 'Azure', 'Azure Communication Services', and 'Java'. This fits anchor 4 (good coverage, a few natural terms missing) rather than 5 (which requires synonyms/extensions-level coverage).

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Without 'Azure' or 'Java' in the description, it could trigger for any chat/messaging skill (Twilio, Slack, Firebase, generic websocket chat), matching anchor 3 ('somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills'). Not 4 because the overlap risk extends to many chat skills, not just closely related ones.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Path

skills/azure-communication-chat-java/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.