Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary progressive-disclosure shell — lean, well-organized, with a real one-level-deep reference — but it delegates so completely that it carries almost no standalone actionable content. A user (or Claude) who only loads SKILL.md learns when to activate the skill and where the details live, but not a single concrete command or step. Surfacing a minimal quick-start inline would raise actionability without breaking the structure.
Suggestions
Add a short 'Quick start' section with 2-3 copy-paste commands (e.g. `bun init`, `bun add <pkg>`, `bun test`) so the body is actionable without loading the 691-line guide.
Summarize the guide's top-level sections (Installation, Project Setup, Package Management, etc.) as a bulleted map so 'for focused work, load the relevant sections' names which sections exist.
Inline one or two of the guide's validation/safety requirements (e.g. the inspect-before-execute installer pattern) so critical checkpoints are visible even if the guide is only partially loaded.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body explains nothing Claude already knows, repeats itself, or pads: it is a tagline, a clearly signaled pointer to the guide ("Read [the detailed guide](references/detailed-guide.md) before executing this skill"), a five-bullet when-to-use list, and a short limitations section. Every section earns its place; the only near-redundancy is the tagline duplicating the description, which is minor and standard. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The body contains no code, commands, or task-level steps — the sole instruction is to read the external guide, and the when-to-use bullets describe scope rather than how to execute anything. This matches anchor 2 ('minimal concrete guidance; high-level hints but missing the specific steps to execute'); it is not 3 because the body offers no partial executable guidance of its own (not even a quick-start command like `bun init`). | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A single clear sequencing rule exists ("Read the detailed guide before executing this skill") with validation framed as delegated-but-mandatory ("Treat its safety, prerequisites, and validation requirements as mandatory"), but the actual workflow steps and checkpoints are implicit — they live entirely in the external guide. Anchor 3 ('sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit') fits; it is not 4 because no concrete step sequence or validation command appears in the body itself. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview pointing to exactly one reference, references/detailed-guide.md, which exists in the bundle, is clearly signaled with a markdown link, and is one level deep (the guide contains no further .md references — only external URLs in its final section). Usage guidance for how to load it ("For focused work, load the relevant sections; for end-to-end work, read the guide completely") plus the well-organized 691-line guide matches anchor 5 ('clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references'). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |