CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

competitor-alternatives

You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.

Quality

59%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/competitor-alternatives/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an extremely lean pointer to a real, well-organized detailed guide, achieving excellent progressive disclosure but at the cost of actionability and workflow clarity, since it carries no concrete guidance itself. The 'When to Use' section adds no information and should be replaced with actual trigger conditions.

Suggestions

Inline a minimal quick-start (e.g., the four page formats and the initial assessment checklist) so the skill is actionable without immediately loading the guide.

Replace the circular 'When to Use' text with concrete conditions under which the skill applies and does not apply.

Summarize the end-to-end workflow sequence (assess → build data → generate page → validate) with its validation checkpoints in the body, referencing the guide for details.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~23-line body is lean with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the 'When to Use' section is circular filler ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') and the Limitations bullets are generic boilerplate that could be trimmed. Fits anchor 4 (minor instances of padding), not 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

The body provides only a pointer — 'Read [the detailed guide](references/detailed-guide.md) before executing this skill' — with no concrete steps, commands, templates, or examples in the body itself. Fits anchor 2 (minimal concrete guidance; missing the specific steps), not 3, since the body offers no partially-executable guidance, only delegation.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

No workflow sequence appears in the body; the sole instruction is to read the external guide (with a note on loading sections for focused work). The delegation itself is coherent, but the actual multi-step procedure (assessment, content architecture, page generation, validation) lives entirely in the external file. Fits anchor 2 (rough guidance, major gaps), not 1, because the pointer and reading instructions are unambiguous.

2 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Scored against the actual bundle: the body is an overview with a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/detailed-guide.md) that exists and is well sectioned, plus explicit guidance on loading it fully vs. by relevant section. This matches anchor 5 (clear overview, well-signaled one-level-deep references, easy navigation).

5 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

48%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states the domain and goal but is written in second person, lacks a 'Use when' trigger clause, and uses goal-oriented phrasing rather than concrete capability listings. It is serviceable but below the quality of the reference good examples.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to create competitor comparison, alternative, or vs. pages for a product website.'

Rewrite in third person and replace goal statements with concrete actions, e.g. 'Creates competitor comparison and alternative pages: researches competitor positioning, drafts section templates, and optimizes pages to rank for competitive search terms.'

Include natural synonyms users would say ('vs', 'versus', 'alternatives to [competitor]', 'comparison page') to broaden trigger coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('creating competitor comparison and alternative pages') with 1-2 actions ('build pages that rank for competitive search terms', 'position your product'), matching anchor 3 rather than 4 since coverage is not comprehensive and the actions are goal statements. Per judging guidelines, the second-person voice ('You are an expert...', 'Your goal is...') reduces the score by 1, giving 2.

2 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (creating competitor comparison and alternative pages that rank and position the product), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not 2 because the 'what' is explicit rather than vague.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant keywords like 'competitor comparison', 'alternative pages', and 'competitive search terms', but misses common variations users naturally say such as 'vs', 'versus', 'comparison page', or 'competitor analysis'. Fits anchor 3; not 4 because keyword coverage is not good enough to be near-comprehensive.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Competitor comparison and alternative pages' carves out a fairly distinct niche, with only minor overlap risk against closely related SEO/copywriting skills. Fits anchor 4; not 5 because there is no explicit trigger phrasing to fully minimize conflict with adjacent content-marketing skills.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Path

skills/competitor-alternatives/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.