advogado-especialista

Advogado especialista em todas as areas do Direito brasileiro: familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional.

Quality

50%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/advogado-especialista/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill is a rich, well-organized Brazilian-law knowledge base with concrete references and a usable 12-step case-analysis template, but it is an oversized monolith that duplicates its own reference file and contains truncated text and role-play padding. It is competent yet inefficient and not properly split across the bundle.

Suggestions

Move the inline 'Legislacao Principal' and 'STJ/STF' jurisprudence tables into references/fontes.md and link to it from the body ('See references/fontes.md for the full legislative and jurisprudence index') instead of duplicating the content.

Fix the truncated sentence at the end of 'How It Works' ('...tem **especialidade profunda** e') and trim the superlative role-play padding to tighten token use.

Add explicit validation checkpoints to the 12-step workflow (e.g., after Etapa 6 verify prescricao/competencia before proceeding; after Etapa 8 confirm custos vs. gratuidade de justica) so the sequence has feedback loops.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Most of the body is dense, genuinely-useful reference data (articles, deadlines, sums, penalties) rather than concepts Claude already knows, but at ~1100 lines it is an excessive monolithic dump padded with superlative role-play ('Jurista de nivel supremo', 'dominio enciclopedico', '30+ anos de atuacao'). Not a 3 because far from lean, not a 1 because it avoids explaining basic concepts.	2 / 3
Actionability	It gives concrete references (specific articles, prazos, value ranges) and a copy-paste 'Parecer Final' template, but much of the body is a lookup encyclopedia and the 'Voce e o Advogado Especialista mais completo' framing is role-play rather than executable guidance. Solid but incomplete as actionable procedure.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 12-step 'Workflow Completo de Analise de Caso' is clearly sequenced (Etapa 1-12), but there are no validation/checkpoint steps and a sentence is truncated mid-phrase ('...tem especialidade profunda e'), leaving the workflow partially broken. Present and sequenced, but with gaps.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	A bundle reference exists (references/fontes.md) but is never linked or signaled from the body; instead the body duplicates legislation and STJ/STF jurisprudence inline across hundreds of lines that belong in that file. Structure exists, but content that should be separate is inline and the reference is orphaned.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly scopes a Brazilian multi-domain legal skill but reads as a role label rather than a capability+trigger statement: it lists areas without concrete actions and omits any 'Use when' guidance. It is functional butgeneric enough to risk overlap with adjacent legal skills.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions to the description, e.g. 'Analisa casos, fundamenta pedidos, estima prazos e custos, e orienta estrategicamente em ...'.

Append an explicit trigger clause: 'Use quando o usuario mencionar advogado, direito, lei, processo judicial, divorcio, inventario, dano moral, trabalhista ou questoes juridicas brasileiras.'

Narrow the scope or note the boundary with advogado-criminal to reduce conflict risk, e.g. 'Para analise criminal detalhada, orquestre com advogado-criminal.'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description comprehensively names the domain ('familia, criminal, trabalhista, tributario, consumidor, imobiliario, empresarial, civil e constitucional') but states only a role ('Advogado especialista') with no concrete actions such as analyzing, drafting, or advising. It is above the vague anchor 1 because the scope is concretely enumerated, but lacks the multiple specific actions required for a 3.	2 / 3
Completeness	It answers 'what' (a specialist lawyer across listed areas) but provides no 'Use when...' clause or explicit trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms a user would say are present ('advogado', 'Direito', and the area names), but common variations users actually utter ('juridico', 'lei', 'processo', 'consulta juridica') are missing from the description.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The Brazilian-law niche with enumerated areas is fairly specific, but the 'todas as areas' breadth and the explicit orchestration with advogado-criminal create real overlap risk with sibling legal skills.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
skill_md_line_count	SKILL.md is long (1115 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Path: skills/advogado-especialista/SKILL.md
Commit: 3dfb633

Reviewed: about 16 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.