cicd-automation-workflow-automate

You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design and implement automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery while maintaining quality and security.

Quality

55%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured with clear use-when/don't-use-when guidance and safety framing, but it stays at middling scores because it repeats the description, gives only high-level actionable guidance, lacks explicit validation checkpoints for a deployment skill, and points to a referenced file that is missing.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints to the Instructions (e.g., 'Run the workflow in a non-production environment and confirm quality gates pass before deploying') to lift the workflow clarity cap.

Provide at least one concrete, copy-paste-ready GitHub Actions workflow snippet or example stage so the guidance is executable rather than abstract.

Create the referenced 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' (or remove/fix the reference) so progressive disclosure points to a real file; also drop the verbatim repeat of the frontmatter description from the body.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is reasonably lean with clear headers, but it repeats the frontmatter description verbatim in the opening paragraph and includes padded lines like 'Focus on creating reliable, maintainable automation that handles edge cases, provides good visibility...', landing it mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened at 3.	3 / 5
Actionability	Instructions give a concrete checklist of deliverables ('caching, artifacts, and quality gates', 'security scans, secret handling, and approvals', 'rollout, rollback, and notification strategy') but no specific commands, workflow snippets, or examples, which is more than minimal hints yet incomplete enough to stay at 3.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A rough sequence exists (inventory -> define stages -> add security -> document rollout) with safety/rollback mentioned, but because this skill drives deployments and risky steps there are no explicit validation/verification checkpoints in the workflow, so the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Sections are well organized and the single reference to 'resources/implementation-playbook.md' is one level deep and clearly signaled, but that file does not exist (no resources/ directory present), so the disclosure path leads nowhere and the score stays at 3 rather than 4.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a clear, specific niche and uses natural trigger terms, but it lacks an explicit 'Use when' clause and is written in second person, which caps completeness and lowers specificity. It is solid but not exemplary.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'Use when setting up CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, or release automation') to raise completeness above 3.

Rewrite in third person voice (e.g., 'Designs and implements CI/CD pipelines...') to avoid the second-person specificity penalty.

Include a few more natural synonyms and file extensions (release pipeline, deploy, .github/workflows, .yml) to push trigger term coverage toward 5.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Quotes 'creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows' and 'Design and implement automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery' name the domain and several actions, which would anchor at 4; reduced by 1 per the rubric's voice penalty because the description uses second person ('You are...', 'Design and implement').	3 / 5
Completeness	It clearly states what the skill does but contains no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, so completeness is capped at 3 per the rubric guideline.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural terms users say such as 'CI/CD pipelines', 'GitHub Actions workflows', and 'automated development processes', giving good keyword coverage, though synonyms like 'release pipeline', 'deploy', or file extensions (.yml/.yaml) are absent so it does not reach 5.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The CI/CD and GitHub Actions framing carves a mostly distinct niche with only minor overlap risk against adjacent devops/deployment skills, matching the anchor for 4 rather than the fully-distinct 5.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Path: skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md
Commit: b6ceca3

Reviewed: about 14 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.