cicd-automation-workflow-automate

You are a workflow automation expert specializing in creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes. Design and implement automation that reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery while maintaining quality and security.

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A brief, well-sectioned instruction skill with concrete directives, but it duplicates the description, lacks executable examples and validation checkpoints for risky deployments, and points to a resource file that is missing.

Suggestions

Add a validation/verification step to the workflow (e.g., run the pipeline in a dry-run or staging environment and confirm gates pass before promoting) to lift workflow_clarity above 2.

Provide a minimal concrete example (such as a small GitHub Actions workflow YAML snippet) or ensure the referenced `resources/implementation-playbook.md` actually exists, to strengthen actionability and progressive disclosure.

Remove the verbatim duplication of the frontmatter description at the top of the body to improve conciseness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean with brief bulleted sections, but the opening paragraph ("You are a workflow automation expert specializing in...") duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim, which is unnecessary padding that could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	Instructions give concrete directives ("Inventory current build, test, and deploy steps", "Define pipeline stages with caching, artifacts, and quality gates", "Add security scans, secret handling, and approvals"), but for a code-heavy CI/CD domain there is no executable example or scaffold (e.g., a sample workflow YAML or commands), and the referenced playbook is missing.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The Instructions are sequenced (inventory -> define stages -> add security -> document strategy), but for a deployment skill involving risky/destructive operations there is no explicit validation or verification checkpoint, which caps workflow clarity at 2.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The body signals an external reference ("open `resources/implementation-playbook.md`") but that file does not exist on disk, so the disclosure structure is incomplete rather than cleanly organized one level deep.	2 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Description

72%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A solid, specific description that names concrete capabilities and uses natural trigger terms, but it lacks an explicit "Use when..." clause and uses second-person voice, capping completeness and reducing specificity.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause such as "Use when automating CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, or release/deploy automation" to raise completeness from 2 to 3.

Rewrite in third person (e.g., "Designs and implements CI/CD pipelines...") to avoid the second-person voice penalty on specificity.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and multiple concrete actions ("creating efficient CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions workflows, and automated development processes"; "reduces manual work, improves consistency, and accelerates delivery"), which would anchor at 3, but the second-person opening ("You are a workflow automation expert") triggers the voice penalty reducing specificity by 1.	2 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers what the skill does, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance inside the description, which per the rubric caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Uses natural terms users actually say ("CI/CD pipelines", "GitHub Actions workflows", "automation", "deployment") with good coverage, matching the high-coverage anchor rather than the partial-coverage anchor.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The CI/CD and GitHub Actions niche is specific with distinct triggers ("CI/CD pipelines", "GitHub Actions workflows"), making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
Path: skills/cicd-automation-workflow-automate/SKILL.md
Commit: a3068b7

Reviewed: about 11 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.