CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

minutes-lint

Health-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts. Use when the user asks "any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions", or wants to audit their decision history.

79

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, actionable runbook: one concrete command, concrete formatting templates for every output case, and targeted gotchas. It avoids concept exposition and stays within scope, with no external references needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean: a single executable command, optional filters as a short list, and formatting templates — it assumes Claude's competence and explains no background concepts, so every section earns its tokens.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready command (`minutes consistency --stale-after-days 14`), concrete flags (`--owner`, `--stale-after-days`), exact output templates, and specific follow-up commands — fully executable, not pseudocode.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clear two-step sequence (run check, parse JSON, then format) with output cases enumerated; this is a read-only query rather than a destructive/batch operation, so the absence of an explicit validation feedback loop does not cap the score.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and none are needed for this single-purpose skill; the body is organized into clearly labeled sections (How to run, Formatting, When to suggest, Gotchas) with no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill organization anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, uses third person, names concrete capabilities, and pairs them with a rich set of natural-language triggers. It cleanly satisfies the what-and-when requirement with no over-claims or padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names several concrete actions — "Health-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts" — rather than vague verbs, matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (health-check meeting knowledge for conflicts/stale commitments) and when ("Use when the user asks...") with concrete triggers, well above the cap-2 threshold for a missing Use-when clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Quotes natural user phrases ("any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions") that a user would plausibly say, giving strong keyword coverage.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The meeting-consistency-lint niche with its specific trigger phrases is distinct and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, fitting the clear-niche anchor.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
silverstein/minutes
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.