CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

minutes-lint

Health-check your meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts. Use when the user asks "any conflicts in my meetings", "check for stale action items", "lint my meetings", "consistency check", "are there contradictions", or wants to audit their decision history.

73

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, executable skill body that stays lean while giving Claude everything needed to run the lint and format output. Minor room for a more explicit verification checkpoint, though the read-only nature limits that need.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient: an executable command, compact filter list, output templates, and gotchas with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance: a copy-paste bash command `minutes consistency --stale-after-days 14`, documented optional flags, and concrete per-conflict and per-stale-item formatting templates covering the common output cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence (run -> parse JSON -> format report -> suggest next steps) with explicit edge-case handling (nonzero exit treated as unavailable), but it is a read-only lint with no destructive/batch validation loop, so it stops short of the explicit validate->fix->retry anchor at 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single-purpose, well-sectioned skill with no need for external references; section headers (How to run, Formatting the report, When to suggest next steps, Gotchas) provide clean navigation, satisfying the simple-skill exception.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with excellent trigger-term coverage and explicit what/when guidance, docked only for the second-person voice in the opening clause. Otherwise near-exemplary.

Suggestions

Rewrite the opening in third person to avoid the specificity penalty, e.g. 'Health-checks meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions ('contradictions, stale commitments, and decision conflicts'), which would anchor at 4, but the second-person voice 'Health-check your meeting knowledge' triggers the -1 specificity penalty per the rubric.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (health-check meeting knowledge for contradictions, stale commitments, decision conflicts) and 'when' (concrete 'Use when the user asks...' clause with multiple trigger phrases).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases including the literal invocation 'lint my meetings', plus 'any conflicts in my meetings', 'check for stale action items', 'consistency check', and 'audit their decision history', covering synonyms and user phrasings.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (meeting consistency linting) with distinct, specific triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
silverstein/minutes
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.