CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

minutes-mirror

Self-coaching analysis of your own behavior across meetings — talk-time ratio, filler words, hedging language, monologue length, energy patterns, and (when meetings are tagged via /minutes-tag) what your behavior in winning meetings looks like vs losing ones. Use this whenever the user says "how did I do", "review my last meeting", "mirror", "self-review", "show my patterns", "coach me", "where am I weak", "talk time", "am I improving", "what do I do in meetings I win", "feedback on me", or asks for any kind of personal feedback on their own meeting behavior. This is the rare skill that gives the user a mirror to their own habits — surface it whenever they show curiosity about their own performance, even if they don't use the word "mirror".

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with strong workflow validation and a real bundled helper script. Main improvements are minor trimming and making the script/metric reference navigation slightly more explicit.

Suggestions

State the "LLMs are bad at exact token counting" rationale once near the script invocation; remove the near-duplicate in the Gotchas section.

Consolidate the 13 Gotchas bullets — merge the two min-data-threshold items and the two speaker-identification items — to cut length without losing the failure modes.

Add a short "References" pointer (e.g. "See scripts/mirror_metrics.py for the metric computation") so the bundle file is discoverable by navigation rather than only inside a code fence.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly lean and coach-toned with executable commands, but the "LLMs are bad at exact token counting" rationale is stated twice and the 13-bullet Gotchas section contains a few items that could be consolidated.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable: a copy-paste bash pipeline invoking a real bundled script, with the script's JSON output fields documented in a table and concrete output-format templates for both modes.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear phased sequence (0→1→2a/2b→3) with explicit validation checkpoints ("Require exit status 0", "Require both sides of the pipeline to exit successfully"), error-recovery on exit code 3, and minimum-data thresholds for the batch pattern mode.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into phases and a one-level-deep reference to scripts/mirror_metrics.py, but the script path sits inside a code block and the metric-field reference table is inlined rather than reached via a clearly signaled navigation pointer.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete capabilities, exhaustive natural trigger phrases, and an explicit what-and-when structure in third-person voice. It is slightly long but every clause earns its place.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete capabilities — "talk-time ratio, filler words, hedging language, monologue length, energy patterns" plus win/loss correlation — giving comprehensive coverage rather than vague domain naming.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (self-coaching analysis of own meeting behavior with named metrics) and when ("Use this whenever the user says…" with concrete trigger phrases).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases users would actually say ("how did I do", "review my last meeting", "mirror", "coach me", "where am I weak", "am I improving") plus synonyms and a catch-all for implicit curiosity.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — a mirror to the user's own meeting habits — with distinct triggers and explicit framing ("the rare skill that gives the user a mirror"), minimizing overlap with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
silverstein/minutes
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.