Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, executable skill body with concrete commands, a clear multi-step workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, and a closing checklist. It avoids over-explaining basics and keeps everything in one well-structured file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, providing only git/gh commands and Minutes-specific conventions (e.g. the no-em-dash rule, classification table) without re-explaining git, conventional commits, or what release notes are. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It supplies copy-paste-ready commands for every phase (git describe, git log ranges, gh release list/view, node scripts/check_version_sync.mjs --release) plus a concrete output markdown template and a verification checklist covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four numbered steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (confirm refs with git rev-parse --verify, run check_version_sync.mjs, verify breaking-change status) and a final checklist that closes the feedback loop before returning the draft. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well organized into Inputs/Steps/Output format/Checklist with the bulk of guidance inline and appropriately scoped; there are no bundle files to reference, so one-level-deep external navigation is not used, leaving minor room for splitting the large output template into a reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |