CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

minutes-search

Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas. Use this whenever the user asks "what did we discuss about X", "find that meeting where we talked about Y", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "what was that idea about", or any question that could be answered by searching their meeting history. Also use for "do I have any notes about" or "check my meetings for".

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is minutes-search in silverstein/minutes

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

Highly actionable content with concrete commands, a validation checkpoint for the reauthorization step, and genuinely useful gotchas. It falls short of top marks on structure: the implicit multi-step workflow is scattered across sections, and two sections coach query refinement redundantly.

Suggestions

Consolidate "Search coaching" and "Tips for good searches" into one section — both coach how to refine queries (e.g., "Search their name: minutes search \"Alex\"" vs "Search for names: \"Alex\""), and merging them would cut tokens and eliminate the overlap.

Lay out the core flow as an explicit numbered sequence — search → reauthorize with `minutes get "<exact path>" --json` → require exit status 0 → use only that response — instead of distributing it across the Output, Coaching, and Gotchas sections.

Consider moving the long-tail gotchas (QMD silent failure, untranscribed meetings) into a reference file so SKILL.md stays a lean overview, which would also strengthen progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and tool-specific ("Search is substring, not fuzzy", "--since requires ISO date format"), but "Search coaching" and "Tips for good searches" overlap in coaching query refinement, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: concrete `minutes search` invocations with flags, a flags table, the exact reauthorization command `minutes get "<exact path>" --json`, a config.toml snippet, and `qmd update && qmd embed` for the semantic-search setup path.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The search → coach vague queries → reauthorize with `minutes get` → "require exit status 0" flow is present with a real validation checkpoint and error-recovery notes ("Check `minutes list`"), but the multi-step sequence is never laid out explicitly — it is distributed across the Output, Coaching, and Gotchas sections.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single-file skill (~85 lines) with no bundle files and well-organized sections (Usage, Flags, Output, How search works, Coaching, Tips, Gotchas); however it exceeds the under-50-lines exception and the coaching/tips/gotcha material shows minor organization gaps (overlapping sections) rather than fully clean structure.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit use-when clause and unusually rich natural-language trigger phrases. Its only weakness is capability coverage: it names a single search action while the body documents filtering, reauthorization via `minutes get`, and optional QMD semantic search.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas" names a specific domain and one concrete action, but offers only a single verb — it omits capabilities the body documents (type/date filters, semantic search), so it does not reach the several-actions coverage of anchor 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both "what" (search meeting transcripts and voice memos for topics, people, decisions, or ideas) and "when" ("Use this whenever the user asks…" with concrete trigger phrases), matching the anchor-5 example pattern.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes a comprehensive set of natural user phrasings — "what did we discuss about X", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "do I have any notes about", "check my meetings for" — covering question-form synonyms users would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche — personal meeting-history search — with distinct triggers like "did we decide on" and "check my meetings for" that are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

silverstein/minutes

Path

.claude/plugins/minutes/skills/minutes-search/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.