CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

minutes-search

Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas. Use this whenever the user asks "what did we discuss about X", "find that meeting where we talked about Y", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "what was that idea about", or any question that could be answered by searching their meeting history. Also use for "do I have any notes about" or "check my meetings for".

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is minutes-search in silverstein/minutes

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is high quality: lean, executable, and well-organized with concrete commands, a clear output contract, useful search coaching, and a genuinely valuable gotchas section covering substring matching, date formatting, and silent QMD failures. It appropriately avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: executable commands, a flag table, an output schema, and a gotchas list, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., it never explains what a meeting transcript is). It stays at level 3 rather than level 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to trim, despite minor overlap between the coaching strategies and the tips list.

3 / 3

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (e.g., `minutes search "pricing strategy"`, `--since 2026-03-01`, `date -v-7d +%Y-%m-%d`, `qmd update && qmd embed`) plus a concrete config.toml snippet, matching the level-3 anchor for fully executable guidance and exceeding the pseudocode/incomplete level 2.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple single-purpose skill whose core action (run `minutes search`) is unambiguous, and per the rubric's simple-skills note that suffices for a 3; the conditional QMD path even includes an explicit recovery step (run `qmd update && qmd embed` first) when search fails silently, and there are no destructive/batch operations that would require a validation cap.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (no references/scripts/assets directories), so the body is a single, well-organized SKILL.md with clearly labeled sections (Usage, Flags, Output, How search works, Search coaching, Tips, Gotchas) and no nested references, satisfying the rubric's allowance for compact skills with no need for external files.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong across all dimensions: it states concrete capabilities, provides abundant natural trigger phrases, covers both what and when explicitly, and carves out a distinct niche. It is concise and uses appropriate third-person voice with no vague fluff.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions across two content types and four search targets: "Search past meeting transcripts and voice memos for specific topics, people, decisions, or ideas." This matches the anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions, and exceeds the level-2 anchor (domain and some actions) by naming several distinct actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what (searching transcripts/memos for topics, people, decisions, ideas) and when ("Use this whenever the user asks...", "Also use for...") with explicit trigger clauses, matching the level-3 anchor and exceeding level 2 where the 'when' is only implied.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes a rich set of natural phrasings users would actually say ("what did we discuss about X", "what did Alex say", "did we decide on", "do I have any notes about", "check my meetings for"), giving good coverage rather than the partial coverage at level 2.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It occupies a clear niche (personal meeting transcripts and voice memos) with distinct triggers unlikely to conflict with general search or note skills, matching the level-3 anchor for a clear niche with distinct triggers.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
silverstein/minutes
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.