Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands, design-token specifics, and a sequenced workflow with validation gates. It is slightly verbose in places and, lacking any bundle/reference files, keeps all detail inline rather than splitting it one level deep.
Suggestions
Tighten the Inputs and Checklist sections by removing guidance Claude already knows (e.g. why exact-match anchor text is bad) to improve conciseness.
Move detailed generator/DESIGN.md integration specifics into a references/ file and link to it from SKILL.md to add genuine one-level-deep progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and assumes Claude's intelligence, but several passages restate well-known concepts (e.g. what internal linking clusters are, what anchor stuffing means) and the Inputs/Checklist/output template carry some repetition that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It supplies executable commands (rg/sed inventory, generate_llms_txt.mjs --check, check_design_tokens.mjs), named design tokens, specific file paths, and a copy-ready output template, giving concrete instruction rather than abstraction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven numbered steps are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (design-token check, --check gate, run site tests) and a final Checklist that acts as a feedback loop, matching the strong anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There is solid section organization, but the skill is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no references/ or bundle files to split off detailed material (DESIGN.md, llms generation internals), so disclosure is not layered across files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |