Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptional operational skill: concrete tool calls, exact argument shapes, byte limits, and idempotency mechanics, with validation checkpoints and error-recovery loops throughout. It only loses points for mild repetition of safety rules and for keeping ~190 lines in one file where an error/limits reference could lighten the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every line encodes app-specific rules Claude could not know (field mappings, byte limits, idempotency suffixes, error strings) with no padding or explanation of known concepts, but safety rules like the approval gate and restricted-meeting stop are repeated across the intro, workflow steps, and Boundaries and could be consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is fully executable: exact tool names, a copy-paste JSON argument shape, an explicit idempotencyKey formula ('mx1:<externalMeetingId>:<clientId>' cut to 110 chars), precise byte limits, and a source-to-target mapping table covering the common dueDate/dueStatement cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six-step sequence embeds explicit validation checkpoints (capability check, schema inspection before using dueStatement/detail, restricted-stub and empty-meeting stops) and a dedicated error-response section with feedback loops (replay handling, suffix retries, fix-once-and-retry for invalid details), matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is well organized into clearly headed sections with all content operational rather than reference bulk, but at ~190 lines with no bundle files, material like the X1 error-response catalog and limits could be split into a one-level-deep reference; the under-50-lines exception for a reference-free 5 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |