Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a dense, high-discipline instruction skill: an explicit phase pipeline with per-phase checks, a blocking exit-checklist gate, a complete disposition taxonomy, and fixed output shape leave little ambiguity about how to execute. The two real costs are the triplicated routing/collaboration metadata (including a ~30-line HTML comment that duplicates a later section) and heavy dependence on reference files that are not shipped in this bundle.
Suggestions
Collapse the routing/collaboration metadata to one place: drop the CAPABILITIES_SUMMARY / COLLABORATION_PATTERNS / BIDIRECTIONAL_PARTNERS HTML comment (or the Collaboration + Overlap Boundaries sections), since the same partner and routing data appears three times in the body.
Ship or verify the `reference/*.md` files the workflow points to — the Exit Checklist's eight items, the lexicon's seven classes, and the translation patterns all live in files absent from this bundle, so the 'Read' pointers currently dead-end.
Inline at least the names of the eight Exit Checklist items in SKILL.md, since EMIT is blocked on them but the canonical list is only reachable through a reference file that cannot be confirmed to exist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body never explains concepts Claude already knows and most lines are rules or pointers, but routing/collaboration data is stated three times: the ~30-line CAPABILITIES_SUMMARY / COLLABORATION_PATTERNS / BIDIRECTIONAL_PARTNERS HTML comment duplicates the Collaboration and Overlap Boundaries sections, and the Trigger Guidance 'Route elsewhere' list repeats the Overlap Boundaries table. This is 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary [content] or could be tightened' (anchor 3); not 4 because an entire duplicated section is more than 'minor instances that could be trimmed', and not 2 because there is no padded filler or over-explanation anywhere else. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill the guidance is fully executable: the Dispositions table gives 'Fires when / Produces' per case, the Numeric Licensing Cascade is an ordered decision procedure with concrete renderings ("aim for 3–5 paragraphs", "cover only the main claim; drop supporting detail"), Output Requirements fixes the four-section deliverable and its order, and failure modes are exemplified ("'Write clearly' → 'write in an easy-to-read style' is a no-op dressed as a fix", "'within exactly 237 characters' is never correct"). Specific examples cover the common cases — the instruction-skill analog of copy-paste-ready code. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The SCAN → CLASSIFY → TRANSLATE → RECONCILE → EMIT table defines focus, required checks, and files to read per phase, and the Exit Checklist is an explicit blocking validation gate: "scored pass/fail with the offending line cited, run before every EMIT. Any failure blocks delivery". Error-recovery paths exist (Ask First conditions, `BLOCKED` return instead of guessing in the `brief` recipe), and per-recipe behavior notes define each workflow deviation — clear sequence, explicit validation, and a checklist for a complex process (anchor 5). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure and signaling are strong: one-level-deep references with a 'Read' column in the phase table, a 'Read First' column in Recipes, and a dedicated Reference Map giving 'read this when...' purpose per file. Not 5: the operational detail the workflow depends on (lexicon, translation patterns, exit-checklist scoring) is deferred to `reference/*.md` and cross-agent files (`oracle/reference/...`, `_common/...`), none of which are present in the bundle being evaluated, so the pointers cannot be verified end-to-end — anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps' is the best fit. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |