Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable with a clear phased workflow, concrete report template, and a strong reference map, but it is somewhat long: time-sensitive regulatory dates are inlined rather than isolated, and some sections duplicate the frontmatter comment. Tightening these would lift conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move scattered time-sensitive dates and version numbers into a dedicated 'Current regulatory dates' section (or a reference file) so they can be updated without bloating the overview.
Relocate the long mobile-app-store disclosures and jurisdiction-specific rule detail into reference files, keeping SKILL.md as a tighter overview that points to them.
Add one fully worked inline example finding (e.g. a sample [H-01] block) so the report format is copy-paste ready without needing reference/examples.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain content (statute tables, risk framework) rather than generic explanations Claude already knows, but a large volume of time-sensitive dates (2024-10-16, 2025-04-23, 2026-01-01, etc.) is scattered through the main body rather than isolated in a deprecated/old-patterns section, and the mobile-disclosures and jurisdiction rules duplicate the frontmatter comment, which could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: a phased workflow table, a copy-paste report-output template, risk-level definitions, recipe subcommands, and a signal-keyword dispatch table; minor gaps remain (no fully worked example inline — that lives in reference/examples.md). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced SCOPE → SCAN → ASSESS → REPORT → SUGGEST workflow with an Ask-first gate for ambiguous jurisdiction and a statute-verification checkpoint ('Cite ... only after verifying they exist'); minor validation gaps keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear Reference Map table signals one-level-deep references to reference/*.md and _common/*.md files, but substantial inline content (jurisdiction-specific rules, the long mobile-store disclosures section) that could live in separate reference files keeps it just below 5; no bundle files are present to verify the referenced paths exist. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |