Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with explicit workflows, validation feedback loops, and a clean reference map. The only weakness is minor verbosity from a duplicated metadata comment block and light overlap between adjacent sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, table-driven, and assumes Claude's competence with no concept-padding, but the duplicated HTML-comment capability block and some overlap across Trigger Guidance, Supported Tools, and Reference Map could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready verification commands (zsh -n, time zsh -i -c exit, zprof), concrete startup/bootstrap targets, permission values (600/644), and specific anti-patterns with quantified reasons. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Defines an explicit SCAN→PLAN→CRAFT→APPLY→VERIFY sequence with a dedicated VERIFY validation phase, before/after benchmarking feedback loops with escalation thresholds, and Always/Ask-First/Never checklists for destructive operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Maintains a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references, a per-recipe "Read First" column, and a Reference Map table stating when to consult each file, yielding easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |