Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, executable procedural skill with strong validation feedback loops and concrete commands throughout. Its main weakness is that all detail lives inline in one file rather than being progressively disclosed via reference files.
Suggestions
Move the 'If your type owns metadata, read this' registration table and the full icon component template into reference files under references/, linking to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Tighten a few elaborative sentences (e.g. the currency rationale in Step 1) to lift conciseness toward fully lean.
Consider extracting the leak-grep patterns and test command list into a scripts/ or references/ file so the main body stays a concise overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and project-specific (jsonbCast, import cycles, client-safe boundary) rather than padded with basics Claude already knows, but a few explanatory sentences could still be tightened, keeping it just below fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (`cd apps/sim && bun run type-check`), a complete icon component template, explicit grep patterns, and named test/lint commands covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Step 1–5 sequence with a 'Hard Rule' feedback loop (let tsc enumerate errors), a pre-finish checklist, and a Required Final Validation block with explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoints. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and a compiler-driven entry point, but it is a single monolithic file with no reference bundle; the metadata-registration table and icon template are inlined detail that could be split out. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |