Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable, well-sequenced code-authoring guidance: every step has exact file paths, complete executable TypeScript for each variant, named reference implementations, a validation command, and a thorough closing checklist. It falls just short of top marks only on minor redundancy between repeated getCost examples and the absence of an error-recovery loop or general build-verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly all content is repo-specific and non-inferable ('per_request' vs 'custom' rate-limiter modes, the '{PREFIX}_COUNT' env var convention, the duplicate 'apiKey' subblock pattern) with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable redundancy — the getCost throw-if-missing example appears twice (the full hosting config block and the 'When the API reports cost' block) — places it at anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's every-token-earns-its-place leanness. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: exact file paths ('tools/types.ts', 'lib/api/contracts/byok-keys.ts', 'blocks/blocks/{service}.ts'), copy-paste-ready TypeScript covering each pricing variant (API-reported cost, computed cost, 'per_request' flat price, gated 'enabled'), a runnable verification command ('bun run check:byok-providers'), and named reference implementations ('tools/image/generate.ts', 'blocks/blocks/google_maps.ts', 'tools/brandfetch/get_brand.ts'). Matches anchor 5's fully executable, common-cases-covered example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are explicitly sequenced in the overview table with per-step 'Where' locations, reinforced by a 12-item checklist and the 'bun run check:byok-providers' validation command. However, there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do when the check fails) and no general build/typecheck verification step, matching anchor 4's 'most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps' rather than anchor 5. The workflow is additive code change, not destructive/batch, so the ≤3 cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill with no bundle files (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist), organized by a step-indexed overview table, clear step headers, and subsections. All content sits on the 6-step workflow path rather than being reference material that clearly belongs in a separate file, fitting anchor 4's 'most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps'; anchor 5 would require well-signaled one-level-deep references, and anchor 3 would require inlined content that should clearly be separate — the edge-case sections (duplicate subblock pattern, rate-limit sizing rationale) are only borderline candidates for extraction. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |