Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and well-sequenced with strong validation checkpoints, but the body is a long single-file monolith that mixes overview with deep reference material. Splitting File Handling / OAuth / V2 into reference files and tightening the example conversation would improve token efficiency and navigation.
Suggestions
Move the File Handling, OAuth Scopes, and V2 Integration Pattern sections into separate reference files and link to them from the main workflow to reduce the inline monolith.
Trim or summarize the 'Example Command' conversation mockup; the numbered step list already conveys the interaction model.
Deduplicate the canonicalParamId rules (stated in both Step 3 and the File Handling section) into a single canonical-param reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly codebase-specific templates that earn their place, but the ~870-line body includes tightenable padding such as the full 'Example Command' conversation mockup and repeated canonical-param rules. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, near-copy-paste templates with real imports and helper names plus executable commands (bun run scripts/generate-docs.ts, bun run check:bare-icons). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence is paired with a 'Hard Rule: No Guessed Response Schemas' stop-and-ask feedback loop and a 'Final Validation (Required)' checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned but monolithic: File Handling, OAuth scopes, and V2 pattern content that could be split into reference files is inline, and cross-skill references are only signaled in passing; no bundle files exist. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |