Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tightly written, highly actionable instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow and concrete validation commands. It assumes competence throughout and avoids padding, with only minor gaps in feedback-loop explicitness and core-task code examples.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense with domain-specific rules; assumes Claude's competence and never explains basic concepts, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths, a named classification taxonomy, explicit policies, and a copy-paste bash validation block, but lacks a concrete code example for the core add/update task itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (Read boundary → Classify → Build context → Add attachment → Wire UI → Validate) with a validation checklist, but no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized section headers with one-level-deep references to real repo source files; no bundle files exist, so all detail is inline with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |