Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable principles list with a clear review workflow and output format. The only real gap is progressive disclosure: the body points to four reference files that are absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add the missing referenced files (typography.md, surfaces.md, animations.md, performance.md) under references/, or move their promised detail inline so the links resolve.
If keeping the external references, verify each linked path exists before shipping so navigation does not break.
Consider consolidating the duplicate Quick Reference and Reference Files tables, which list the same four files with near-identical captions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense — e.g. 'Outer radius = inner radius + padding' and exact values like 'scale(0.96)', 'bounce must always be 0' — with no padding explaining CSS or React basics, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives exact, executable values and properties — 'rgba(0,0,0,0.1)', 'cubic-bezier(0.2,0,0,1)', 'transition-property: scale, opacity', 'active:scale-[0.96]' — copy-paste-ready guidance for each principle. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Review Checklist sequences the inspection and the Review Output Format enforces an explicit formatting rule ('Always present changes as a markdown table', 'omit that table entirely'), providing a checklist-style validation step for this review skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with a quick-reference table and a Reference Files section, but the four referenced files (typography.md, surfaces.md, animations.md, performance.md) do not exist in the bundle, so the one-level-deep references are dead links rather than navigable detail. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |