Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, code-forward recipe collection with clear workflow sequencing and reflection feedback loops. Its only weaknesses are mild verbosity in the methodology section and no use of external reference files to keep the main body leaner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is code-forward and lean, assuming Claude's competence with bash/jq and avoiding concept-padding; the 'Research Methodology — Read This First' prose and the reflect-loop template are substantive but slightly redundant with the broad→narrow example above them, so minor trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Dozens of copy-paste-ready bash commands with concrete jq filters, flags, and stdin payloads cover the common cases (extract content, citations, search, streaming capture, domain/academic/SEC modes), matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The research methodology is clearly sequenced (Round 1 broad → AGENT REFLECTS → Round 2 narrow → Round 3) with explicit reflection feedback loops and an exit-code map for error recovery; held below 5 because the checkpoints are advisory rather than strict validation gates. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the single ~310-line file is well-organized into clearly-headed sections separated by horizontal rules with easy navigation, but it does not split the lengthy research methodology or a jq-pattern reference into one-level-deep files, leaving a minor organization gap for a document this size. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |