Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong instruction-only skill: concrete question banks, evaluation criteria, scoring labels, and a complete output template make it immediately actionable, and the five-step workflow is well sequenced. The main costs are motivational filler in 'The Point' and duplicated priority-template content that inflate token usage without adding guidance value.
Suggestions
Trim 'The Point' to one or two lines and remove the duplicated Recommended Priority block (keep it only in the Output Format section).
Move the idea-categories table and 'Prompts to Unstick Thinking' into a references file to shorten the always-loaded body.
Add a brief checkpoint after Step 1 (e.g. confirm the core action and top complaints with the user before generating ideas) to close the feedback-loop gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient heuristic content, but 'The Point' explains product philosophy Claude already knows ("Most product work is incremental... That's necessary but not sufficient", "Not 10% better. Not 'nice to have.'"), and the Recommended Priority template appears twice (Step 5 and Output Format). | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance throughout: a six-criteria evaluation table, a four-level scoring scale (🔥/👍/🤔/❌), a full output-format template, and sharp rules like "'better UX' is not an idea. 'One-click rescheduling from notification' is." The absence of code is explicitly justified as pure strategy. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (understand value → find opportunities → evaluate → identify leverage → prioritize) with the scoring step acting as an evaluation checkpoint. No destructive or batch operations, so the validation cap does not apply, but there is no explicit feedback loop around the Step 1 research. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with well-organized, clearly navigable sections and no buried or nested references. Minor gap: the idea-categories table and the unstick-thinking prompts could live in reference files to slim the main body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |