Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable translation rulebook with concrete examples and a well-structured reference file. Its main gap is workflow_clarity: the batch-translation path lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop across files.
Suggestions
Add an explicit cross-file validation checkpoint to the Batch Translation workflow — e.g. after translating, run a verification pass (sidebar completeness, link /en/ prefixes, no stray Chinese characters) and loop back to fix any flagged files before declaring done.
Fold the per-file Quality Checklist into a 'validate' step at the end of each numbered workflow so verification is sequenced rather than presented as a separate section.
Consider moving the inline terminology/title-mapping tables into references/translation-memory.md to slim the body, since that reference already tracks stable terminology.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and rule-dense with no concept-explaining fluff; every line is a concrete directive (path transforms, do-not-translate lists, term mappings). It assumes Claude's competence; the only minor redundancy is the Quality Checklist restating earlier rules, which does not rise to padding. Not a 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: exact image-path transforms ('./images/foo.png' becomes '../images/foo.png'), explicit terminology mappings ('花屏' -> 'artifacts'), and sidebar config locations. As an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized; the guidance is fully actionable. Not a 2 because no key detail is missing or pseudocoded. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | New/Update/Batch workflows are clearly sequenced and a per-file Quality Checklist exists, but batch operations over many files lack an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop or cross-file verification checkpoint. Per the rubric's batch-operation note this caps the score at 2; not a 1 because the sequences and checklist are present. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clear sections and references 'references/translation-memory.md' — verified as a real, one-level-deep, clearly signaled file with no nested-reference chains. Not a 2 because references are explicitly signaled and appropriately separated rather than inline or deeply nested. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |