Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, actionable skill body that captures project-specific translation rules with concrete examples and a useful reference file. The main improvements are trimming generic style advice, adding an explicit fix-and-retry validation loop, and deduplicating terminology between the body and the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean project-specific rules and concrete transforms, but the 'English Documentation Style' section includes generic writing advice Claude already knows ('Prefer active voice where natural', 'Use clear, concise technical English') that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: concrete before/after path transforms ('docs/index.md using ./images/foo.png becomes docs/en/index.md using ../images/foo.png'), explicit page-title mappings ('配置参数详解 -> Configuration Reference'), and specific terminology rulings cover the common cases copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced workflows plus a 'Quality Checklist' verification step provide good checkpoints, but there is no explicit validate-then-fix-then-retry feedback loop and the batch workflow's verification is limited to sidebar completeness. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | One well-signaled one-level-deep reference ('references/translation-memory.md') with clear section structure, but the inline 'Terminology' subsection duplicates content that the reference already holds, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |