Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and highly actionable with copy-paste commands and a clear workflow. The only gap is the absence of explicit validation/feedback loops for the batch export and SQL operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after export-md (e.g., verify the Markdown files were written and report counts).
Include a brief verify-or-retry step in the query workflow for cases where freshness checks show stale data.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section and code block earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste ready commands (search, databases, sql, export-md, doctor, status, sync) cover the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step query sequence is present with freshness and reporting checkpoints, but the batch export-md and read-only SQL operations lack an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files and well-organized sections (Sources, Refresh, Query Workflow), meeting the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |